
Researchers asked 1,700 students in undergraduate biology courses to name the classmates they thought were the strongest in their mastery of the subject material. This was done on several occasions during the duration of the course. To adapt for gender differences in class participation, researchers compared men and women students who instructors said were outspoken in class. For this group a woman had to have a grade point average three quarters of a point higher than a man to be rated as equally competent by male classmates.

Researchers note that in 11 different class surveys they found no bias whatsoever or very little bias among women students who tended to rate male and female peers equally according to actual class performance. The study estimates that overall “gender bias among male students was 19 times stronger than among females.”
Dr. Eddy notes the implications of the study by stating that “to stay in STEM you have to believe you can do it, and one of the things that can convince you of that is your peers saying you can do it. Helping students find peers who believe in them is really important, especially for women, because they’re not likely to get that from males in their class.”
“Given that we typically think of biology as a STEM field without a gender gap, you could imagine that other fields like physics or mathematics or engineering, which numerically are very dominated by males, would have an even stronger effect than what we’re finding,” Eddy added.
The full article, “Males Under-Estimate Academic Performance of Their Female Peers in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms,” was published on PLOS One. It may be downloaded by clicking here.


