
The study authors examined information from the 2016 Merit Principles Survey that included reports of abusive behavior from nearly 2,500 federal employees, finding consistently lower rates of corrective action taken in response to claims made by women compared to those made by men.
Next, the authors conducted four online experiments that presented participants with scenarios regarding workplace abuse, differing only in the gender of the complainant. The participants were then asked to judge the credibility of the claims and decide if any action should be taken. Aligned with their earlier findings, the authors found women’s claims were taken less seriously than men’s reports. However, when the scenario included evidence to back up the claim, such as chat logs, emails, or eyewitness accounts, participants treated reports by men and women the same.

To overcomes these stereotypes, the authors call for organizations to implement standardized systems that ensure each claim is evaluated solely on the information provided. They suggest firms should offer anonymous reporting, create dedicated channels for employees to voice concerns to someone other than their manager, and separate people who receive reports from those who evaluate them.


